Boeing exits Navy trainer bid

Boeing just made a tough call: after getting the T-7A Red Hawk approved for Air Force production, it walked away from the Navy’s lucrative $2.7 billion jet trainer competition. Why? The T-7A didn’t meet the Navy’s requirements, and Boeing decided chasing a complex Navy contract wasn’t worth risking more schedule slips or piling on cost overruns. With rivals Textron/Leonardo and Sierra Nevada now the only contenders, Boeing is betting it’s smarter to focus on programs where it can deliver—like the T-7A for the Air Force and fixes for its troubled KC-46 tanker—than to gamble on a one-size-fits-all jet that could undermine both services.

But here’s the catch: if Boeing’s tanker and trainer fixes don’t stick the landing, it could lose years of Navy sustainment work and widen its defense revenue gap. The KC-46 tanker’s new vision system just cleared critical flight tests, but retrofits might take up to seven years, and the Air Force won’t commit to more buys until it’s proven. Meanwhile, Boeing is hustling to ramp up commercial jet deliveries after a wiring snag, pouring $2.35 billion into its Wichita plant and launching a new workforce pipeline. An almost $1 billion deal with Uganda Airlines brings promise, but cash flow and execution risks remain high.

Featuring reporting from Defence Industry Europe and Yahoo Finance.

Powered by Apisod.com